Former Australian wicketkeeper Brad Haddin has voiced his support for India’s decision to continue batting during the controversial final hour of the Manchester Test against England.
Brad Haddin Backs India’s Stance
Haddin commented on the unique conclusion to the Manchester Test, noting England’s initial confidence when India was two wickets down with no runs. However, he highlighted the “unbelievable partnership” by Shubman Gill and KL Rahul, which showcased India’s tremendous fight and application.
As the game unfolded, England realized they could not win and suggested ending the match. Haddin found this shift in attitude noteworthy.
“I like what India did, mate, they earned the right to stay out there as long as they need to,” Haddin stated. He firmly believed India had the right to pursue milestones, even a century, asserting that England’s dissatisfaction stemmed purely from the game not going their way.
What Really Happened at Manchester?
The controversy ignited with just an hour remaining on the final day. England captain Ben Stokes approached India’s Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar, offering a handshake to signify a draw.
However, the Indian batsmen declined the offer, choosing to play on. This decision forced the match into the mandatory last 15 overs.
The refusal reportedly led to a verbal spat between Stokes, his teammates, and the Indian batsmen. Despite the tension, both Jadeja and Sundar went on to complete their individual centuries before finally agreeing to a draw five overs later.
The Counter-Argument: England’s Perspective
Former England cricketer David Lloyd offered a contrasting viewpoint on the incident. He argued that there’s a “facility to end the game” by calling a stalemate.
Lloyd believed Stokes had correctly identified the stalemate, acknowledging that neither team could secure a win from that point. He questioned the pursuit of individual milestones, like a maiden Test century, in circumstances he considered against the spirit of the game.
- The incident sparked a significant debate among former players regarding sportsmanship and cricket rules.
- Brad Haddin supported India’s right to continue batting, emphasizing their earned position and England’s shifting sentiment.
- David Lloyd advocated for an earlier draw, suggesting a clear “stalemate” should have been accepted by both sides.
- India’s batsmen, Jadeja and Sundar, completed centuries before agreeing to the draw, adding to the day’s drama.
This event reignited discussions about the unwritten rules of cricket, particularly concerning how draws are handled when individual milestones are within reach. It highlights the delicate balance between competitive spirit and traditional sportsmanship in the sport.
